Topic: The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle by Haruki Murakami
Foci Questions:
- Can the text exist without the reader? (reader-response theory--I'll post a little definition at the bottom...)
- Why might an author want to or not want to change the "narrative distance" throughout a text?
- Where does The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle's existence as a postmodern novel come into play?--In what way does this concept of "narrative distance" fit into postmodernism as a literary movement?
Reader-response criticism is a school of literary theory that focuses on the reader (or "audience") and their experience of a literary work, in contrast to other schools and theories that focus attention primarily on the author or the content and form of the work.
Reader-response theory recognizes the reader as an active agent who imparts "real existence" to the work and completes its meaning through interpretation. Reader-response criticism argues that literature should be viewed as a performing art in which each reader creates their own, possibly unique, text-related performance.
I read one of Murakami's other books, and metafictional elements were everywhere. Does metafiction have a strong presence in The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle's and, if it does, how does it apply in the context of narrative distance?
ReplyDelete